ISO 9000-3 Digest         Thursday, 14 March 1996      Volume 01 : Number 012

In this issue:

	Need help defining input/output requirements
	[none]
	FYI: Results of ASQC CQA Cyber-survey (fwd)
	Changing from Waterfall to Spiral Process 
	What does "ticket" stand for 
	Non-member submission from ["Wikramanayake, Nihal" ] (fwd)
	RE: Non-member submission from ["Wikramanayake, Nihal" ] (fwd) 
	Opportunities in SW Quality at Bell Atlantic in Silver Spring MD
	Cyber-Q's Dinner during Annual Quality Congress, Chicago, 5/14
	Question: Control of Development Tools 
	Announcement: Measurement Quality conference 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Melanie Hopwood" 
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 11:22:43 CST6CDT
Subject: Need help defining input/output requirements

Hello

I work for a medical device software organization.  We are certified 
to ISO-9000 and TickIT.

We are in the process of changing our software development process 
from a traditional Waterfall model to a more Spiral Process.  With 
the traditional Waterfall model it was easy to define our 
input/output requirements for each software development phase.  Our 
development phases were for example: Research/Feasibility, 
Requirements, Design, Implementation/Integration and Alpha.  Now we 
are going to be combining the Requirements, Design, and 
Implementation/Integration Phases.  I am looking for some suggestions 
on setting up requirements for our development process and how to 
define steps when to perform development audits.

Any help with this would be greatly appreciated.    Have a great 
day!!

You can e-mail me at hopwoodm@cms-stl.com.

Melanie Hopwood
Software Quality Assurance Engineer

Computerized Medical Systems
1195 Corporate Lake Dr.
St. Louis, MO  63132

phone: (314)993-0003
fax: (314)993-0075


------------------------------

From: raychel@bns101.bng.ge.com (Rick Raychel ph2109)
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 96 08:32:37 EST
Subject: [none]

subscribe iso9000-3-digest raychel@bng.ge.com
___________________________________________________________________________
Rick Raychel                                E-Mail:      raychel@bng.ge.com
Lockheed Martin Control Systems             Phone Number:      607-770-2109
600 Main Street                             FAX:  607-770-2954 / 8*255-2954
Johnson City, NY  13790-1888                     
___________________________________________________________________________

------------------------------

From: "Bill Casti, CQA (Moderator)" 
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 00:57:23 -0500 (EST)
Subject: FYI: Results of ASQC CQA Cyber-survey (fwd)

NOTE: Mr. Arter's survey was distributed to all of the QUALITY.ORG email 
discussion lists last month. These are the results of his informal 
cyber-survey. We both thank those of you who responded for your 
participation.

If you are subscribed to more than one list, you will receive duplicates 
of this message, one for each list you're on. My apology for the 
unavoidable duplication.

Regards.
Bill


- ---------- Forwarded message ----------


In February of 1996, I asked participants in the several internet
discussion lists whether the ASQC's Certified Quality Auditor
should be changed. I estimate that about 5,000 people read the
message. In order to provide data for discussion of the issue in
Kansas City, I asked the participants to vote for one of three
choices:

A.     The CQA should not be changed
B.     The CQA should include knowledge of ISO 9001/2/3
C.     The CQA should become equivalent to the ISO 9000 Lead
       Assessor Course final exam

I must have touched something dear to many of you, as the
responses came within two hours of posting on a Friday afternoon!
Many were well thought-out and presented good information.

Date    A      B     C     Unknown

2/2    14      5     1     6
2/3     1      4     3     1
2/4     3      3     -     1
2/5     9      4     5     5
2/6     4      2     1     1
2/7     4      2     1     1
2/8     4      4     1     -
2/9     3      3     1     -
2/10    2      2     -     1
2/12    2      5     1     -
2/13    1      -     -     -
2/14    3      2     1     -
2/15    3      -     -     -

Total  54     36    15    16


Cyber Summary:

The A respondents generally felt the CQA exam should cover the
principles of good auditing which would be applicable to any
Standard. B's respondents were concerned with doing business
internationally, affirming that ISO Standards hold a lot of sway
in that arena. The C respondents seemed to feel the CQA exam could
use more tooth, which they do feel is present in the ISO 9000 Lead
Assessor exam. The Unknown column represents responses that were
more complicated than the clear choices offered in the other three
columns.

ASQC Quality Audit Division Recommendation
(Kansas City, February 24)

Similar to the internet discussions, the members of the Quality
Audit Division expressed passion in their CQA and its exam. After
a round of discussion, five voted to "include more specific
information from quality management system standards, including
ISO 9001/2/3, but only in a situational context." Thirty voted to
"keep the CQA exam independent of specific knowledge of any
particular quality standard." We have passed this information on
to the ASQC's Certification Committee.

Thank you all for your participation!

- --------------------------------------------------------
Dennis R. Arter, "The Audit Guy"   ->NEW ADDRESS<-
Columbia Audit, 6951 W. Grandridge Blvd, Kennewick, WA 99336
509/783-0377, fax/783-1115, internet: darter@mcimail.com


- ------------- End of Forwarded Message ---------------------

==============================================================================
 Bill Casti, CQA                                     Email: help@quality.org
 - Domain Owner, QUALITY.ORG                         Pager: +1 800 604 6149
 - List Moderator, "TQM in Manufacturing and Service Industries"
 - Chairman, Electronic Media
    ASQC Section 0511 (Northern VA)     Section Email: E-media@quality.org
 - Senior Internet Systems Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          We support open standards and First Amendment rights.
  We oppose the censorship provisions of the 1996 Communications Decency Act.
See http://www.aclu.org for details about how you can help defend free speech.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           QUALITY RESOURCES ONLINE at: http://www.quality.org/qc
==============================================================================  







------------------------------

From: calafut@epix.net (George J. Calafut)
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 96 13:44:50 PST
Subject: Changing from Waterfall to Spiral Process 

Melanie,

RE:  Changing from a waterfall to a spiral development process, looking for help on setting up 
requirements, defining steps, and performing audits(posted March 5, 1996)


My impression is that your spiral process is home grown rather than an existing process('off the shelf").  
The easiest way to define requirements & steps is to map your process to an existing spiral process model. 
 This mapping should ensure that your process is complete & addresses all TickIT requirements, e.g. 
planning, validation, verification, etc.

I'll fax you an example of a spiral model that should be useful.  This model was taken from a TickIT 
Auditor's training course I attended..

For many years, I worked at an ISO/TickIT certified programming laboratory at IBM.  Initially, we used 
the waterfall model exclusively but later began experimenting spiral/rapid prototyping methods.  Before 
rolling out the new process to the whole organization, we piloted it on specific projects. The pilots helped 
expose glitches, allowed time for refinements, and provided an opportunity to train development 
staff(important for TickIT).  You might try piloting your process before using it consistently.

Regarding development audits, your audit schedule will depend on your specific situation, e.g. do you 
have specific problem areas that need attention, or do you want to cover all phases of the development 
process evenly.

If I can be of further assistance, my email address is calafut@epix.net.

Regards,

George Calafut, CQA.



------------------------------

From: "Wikramanayake, Nihal" 
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 96 17:46:51 MST
Subject: What does "ticket" stand for 

What does 'Ticket' stand for in relation to  iso9000-3 (Software)
certification issued in Europe?
                              Thanks

------------------------------

From: "Bill Casti, CQA (Moderator)" 
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 21:04:03 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Non-member submission from ["Wikramanayake, Nihal" ] (fwd)

NOTE: Respond ONLY to the poster (below) and/or to the list, not to me.
Bill

- ---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 19:48:12 -0500
From: "Wikramanayake, Nihal" 
To: iso9000-3@quality.org
Subject: What does "ticket" stand for

What does 'Ticket' stand for in relation to  iso9000-3 (Software)
certification issued in Europe?
                              Thanks


------------------------------

From: calafut@epix.net (George J. Calafut)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 96 12:03:54 PST
Subject: RE: Non-member submission from ["Wikramanayake, Nihal" ] (fwd) 

Nihal,
Heres a definition of TickIT from ISO Easy(online).

Q: What is TickIT?

A: The TickIT program was created by the government of the United Kingdom to provide a
method for registering software development systems based on the ISO 9000-3 standard. (Note,
that's dash 3, not 9003.) The scheme was jointly developed by the United Kingdom Department
of Trade and Industry (DTI) and the British Computer Society. TickIT is fully explained in the
Guide to Software Quality Management System Construction and Certification Using EN
29001. The Guide is available from DISC TickIT Office / 2 Park Street / London W1A 2BS /
England. Phone 44-71-602-836, Fax 44-71-602-8912. 

The ISO 9000-3 Standard is named "Quality management and quality assurance standards - Part
3: Guidelines for the application of ISO 9001 to the development, supply and maintenance of
software." It was originally written as a "guidance standard." The TickIT program turns it into a
compliance standard. 

TickIT auditors must several years experience as software developers, giving them the specialized
knowledge and experience required to audit under the scheme. They then must take the TickIT
lead auditor course and pass required exams. 

In summary, TickIT is a UK certification scheme for software that sets professional requirements for 
software auditors & provides special guidance for software audits.

Regards,

George J. Calafut, CQA

- ---------------Original Message---------------

NOTE: Respond ONLY to the poster (below) and/or to the list, not to me.
Bill


- ---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 19:48:12 -0500
From: "Wikramanayake, Nihal" 
To: iso9000-3@quality.org
Subject: What does "ticket" stand for

What does 'Ticket' stand for in relation to  iso9000-3 (Software)
certification issued in Europe?
                              Thanks





------------------------------

From: ASQC Section 0511 
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 12:39:03 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Opportunities in SW Quality at Bell Atlantic in Silver Spring MD

I've just received some new position postings from Bell Atlantic, 
specifically for SW Quality professionals. Positions will be at their 
Silver Spring MD facility. They are online under the "Telecom 
Opportunities" section at the top of the QUALITY.ORG homepage, as well as 
in the "Employment Opportunities" section. If you cannot access the 
homepage and want a copy of the postings, let me know.

Regards.
Bill

==============================================================================
 Bill Casti, CQA                               Pager: +1 800 604 6149
 Chairman, Electronic Media,           Section Email: asqc0511@quality.org
 ASQC Section 0511 (Northern VA)       General Email: e-media@quality.org
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           E-media Mailing Address:    PO Box 1412
                                       Herndon VA 22070-1412
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Section 0511's PGP public key is available by fingering asqc0511@quality.org
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Online Quality Resources at http://www.quality.org/qc
==============================================================================



------------------------------

From: "Bill Casti, CQA (Moderator)" 
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 01:13:26 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Cyber-Q's Dinner during Annual Quality Congress, Chicago, 5/14

Here's the announcement and current list of those who've RSVP'd so far. 
If any of you are going to be in Chicago for the ASQC Annual Quality
Congress and would like to join us for some informal socializing and
conversation with some of the foremost Quality folks and the rest of us,
at our 2nd Annual Offsite Cyber-Q's Dinner Gathering, email your RSVP
directly to me, at: help@quality.org, *not* to this list's posting address. 

NOTE: This message is being distributed to a number of Quality lists, so 
you may get duplicates, if you're subscribed to more than one list. My 
apology for the unavoidable duplications.

Thanks.
Bill

- ------------


[Please send your dinner RSVPs only to: help@quality.org, and NOT to the 
list. Thanks!]


            !!!!!       The Cyber-Q's' Eat Again      !!!!!
 

              Who: THE CYBER-Q's 2ND ANNUAL AQC OFFSITE DINNER GATHERING
 
             When: Tuesday, May 14th
 
             Time: Cocktails from 5:45-6:45pm
                   Start Ordering Dinner at 6:45pm
 
            Where: Giordano's Pizza
	  	   236 S. Wabash (at Jackson)
		   Chicago, IL
	  	   (312) 939-4646                 
 
Type of Food: Pizza, Italian     	 Vegetarian Available? Yes.
Handicapped Acessible? Yes. 

Prices: Average cost of a dinner entree: less than $15-20

                          *****
                
Here's who has committed to being there, as of posting date:    
 
Bill Casti, CQA			help@quality.org
Dan O'Leary			doleary@mr.picker.com
Cindy Visscher			Cvisscher@aol.com
Sam Friedman			FriedSH@aol.com
Boyce Grier			Boyce.H.Grier__Jr@att.com
Chuck Messall 			Messall.Chuck.MM7@MacMail1.nb.rockwell.com
Mr. & Mrs. Tom Slaughter	us022066@interramp.com
Chris Seow			cseow@pmc1.pmc.port.ac.uk
Hal Popplewell			GaltJohn22@aol.com
Dave Miller			djm@ihgp.ih.att.com
Robert Matthews			rfmatth@sandia.gov	
John Hankwitz			JHANKWITZ@qtiworld.com
Tess Ailshire			Tbailsh@aol.com
John Shoemaker			Administrator@qof.com
Dennis & Mary Lynn Arter	darter@mcimail.com
Becky Knight			BKnightB@aol.com
Lew Atkinson    		atkinsol@vitro.com


Thanks. I hope to see all of you on the 14th of May!
Bill
 

==============================================================================
 Bill Casti, CQA                                     Email: help@quality.org
- - Domain Owner, QUALITY.ORG                          Pager: +1 800 604 6149
- - List Moderator, "TQM in Manufacturing and Service Industries"
- - Chairman, Electronic Media
    ASQC Section 0511 (Northern VA)     Section Email: E-media@quality.org
- - Senior Administrator, Internet Systems - Federal Emergency Management Agency
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          We support open standards and First Amendment rights.
  We oppose the censorship provisions of the 1996 Communications Decency Act.
See http://www.aclu.org for details about how you can help defend free speech.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           QUALITY RESOURCES ONLINE at: http://www.quality.org/qc
==============================================================================  




------------------------------

From: gdaczkow@telesciences.com (Greta H Daczkowski)
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 96 15:15 EST
Subject: Question: Control of Development Tools 

Hello all!

We are performing our first internal audits and ran across a good question:

If Engineering uses software on a TECELEK (data generation) which is provided
by Tekelec (however you spell it), should this software be under some "control
process" whereby the original software assigned a control number and archived
in a location where it will not be damaged by environment or just lost.

We also have some firmware that falls into this category.  The key here is, 
the items are used in the development process.  They do not become a part of
the final product, but they will be used to troubleshoot problems or to 
assist in future software development.

Let me know your opinions on where we draw the line.  It's the hardware guys
operating in the lab who are effected.  They do not want to have to archive 
their tools.


===================================================================
     _/_/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/       Greta Daczkowski
    _/          _/     _/       System Test Engineer
   _/  _/_/_/  _/      _/       Securicor Telesciences 
  _/      _/  _/      _/         (609) 866-1000 
 _/_/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/           email:g.daczkowski@telesciences.com
==================================================================


------------------------------

From: Philip Stein 
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 19:55:24 -0500
Subject: Announcement: Measurement Quality conference 

Final Announcement  
Measurement Quality Conference 
 
The Fourth Annual National Conference of the  
ASQC Measurement Quality Division 
 
April 23-25, 1996  
Rockville, MD 
 
Preceded by a One-Day Tutorial: 
Basics of Measurement Science for Industry and Business 
April 22, 1996. 
 
The tutorial and the conference are open to the 
public and are not restricted to ASQC members. 
 
The annual Measurement Quality Conference has 
been established to provide a forum for topics 
where the interests of metrology and quality 
professionals intersect, i.e., the quality 
aspects of good measurement and the measurement 
aspects of effective quality management. There 
will be a mix of panel discussions and individual 
presentations. The Measurement Quality Conference 
devotes ample time for informal discussion with 
the speakers and other participants, both during 
and between the sessions.  This year's theme is 
on assuring and maintaining measurement 
traceability and uncertainty. 
 
Sponsored by:    
American Society for Quality Control (ASQC)  
Measurement Quality Division  
and 
the National Institute of Standards and Technology 
U.S. Department of Commerce 
 
Location:        
The DoubleTree Hotel  
1750 Rockville Pike 
Rockville, MD  
(301) 468-1100, 
FAX: 301-468-0163  
Rate of $114 single, or $125 double, includes tax. 
 
Transportation:          
BWI Super Shuttle, (301) 369-0009  
Suburban Airport Shuttle, (301) 279-2222 
Washington Metro Red Line train towards "Shady Grove"  
to the Twinbrook station. 
The hotel is immediately across the street from the Twinbrook 
station. 
 
Technical Information:   
Carroll S. Brickenkamp, NIST 
Telephone: (301) 975-4291 Fax: (301) 926-0416  
e-mail: Carroll.Brickenkamp@nist.gov 
 
Registration Fees:   
The April 23-25 Conference Registration fee is $290  
per person, and includes continental breakfasts,  
coffee breaks, lunches, a reception, and the proceedings. 
 
The Basics of Measurement Science for Industry and Business 
Tutorialon April 22 
Fee is $225 per person, and includes materials, workbook, and  
two coffee breaks.  
 
Both Master and Visa credit cards are accepted. 
 
TO REGISTER:  
Send your name, company affiliation, address, telephone,  
fax, and e-mail address to: 
Dan Harper, Treasurer 
822 NW Murray Blvd., Suite 238  
Portland, OR 97229  
Telephone: (503) 646-1380 
Fax: (503) 646-1380 
 
THE PROGRAM: 
 
Tutorial: 
Basics of Measurement Science for Industry and Business  
April 22, 1996 Preceding the Conference. 
Doubletree Hotel, Rockville, MD 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. 
 
The tutorial, taught by Philip Stein and Woody 
Eicke, will cover the following topics:  
Principles of standardization 
Calibration and traceability 
Industrial and business measurements 
Metrology requirements of ISO 9000 and QS 9000 
Fundamentals of dimensional measurement 
Fundamentals of DC and low frequency electrical measurements  
Overviews of temperature, time, mass, and color measurements 
 
- --------------------------------------------------------------- 
Conference: 
- ----------- 
Tuesday, April 23  
8:30 a.m. Registration and continental breakfast  
9:00 a.m. Welcome & Overview of the Measurement Quality Division 
Future of the Measurement Quality Conference  
Dan Carlson, MQD Chair 
 
9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Workshop on Quality in the Measurement Laboratory 
 
Organized by M. Carroll Croarkin, NIST Statistical 
Engineering Division, and presented by her and others on the NIST staff.  
Specific topics will include:  
 
Uncertainty Analysis and Guidelines.  
This tutorial will describe how to evaluate and report uncertainties 
in terms of the ISO guidelines. 
 
Control (Check) Standards and Their Use in Measurement Process  
Monitoring and Uncertainty Analysis.  
This tutorial explores incorporating "known" measurement values into 
routine measurement processes in order to quantify your 
own measurement uncertainty, and to track (and control) drift and shift. 
 
Case Studies for Uncertainty Analysis. 
Simple and advanced techniques for estimating measurement 
uncertainty and for using test reports in calculating your own  
measurement uncertainty will be provided. 
 
5:30 p.m. Reception  
 
Measurement Quality Division Council Meeting 
Open to all attendees 
- ------------------------ 
Wednesday, April 24, 1996 
 
8:30 a.m. Measurement Aspects of Quality Standards  
This session focuses on specific areas of written standards and guides 
that deal with measurements primarily from a management 
perspective.   
 
ISO 9000, ISO Guide 25, and ANSI Z540-1 are the primary standards under 
discussion. The relationships among various quality standards, concepts,  
and philosophies such as TQM and the Malcolm Baldrige National 
Quality Award and their implications for measurement practitioners will 
also be discussed. 
 
Ted Doiron, Dimensional Metrologist at NIST, and 
Dennis Sanchez, Lockheed Martin will speak. 
 
10:30 a.m.  There's More to Quality Than Standards  
There seems to be an insidious belief that adherence to quality standards 
is quality. While written standards give basic elements of 
quality systems, attainment of the highest quality levels requires  
motivated, educated, and well-assigned staff.   
This panel discussion will offer a look at motivational needs  
and tools for fulfilling them.  
 
Panelists include  
Linda Doherty, Director of the Navy's Total Quality Leadership Office,  
Carl Thor of Jarretthor International, 
Tom Kimbrell from the Community College of Aurora, Colorado, 
Jack Pekar, Kennemetal,Inc. and noted author. 
 
1:30 p.m.  Preparing the Calibration Laboratory for Accreditation. 
Presentations will be made by representatives from the two accreditation 
bodies in the U.S. dealing with calibration laboratories 
 -- the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA) and 
the NIST National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation 
Program (NVLAP) -- and from two recently accredited laboratories,  
one laboratory maintaining its accreditation for nearly 10 
years, and one now preparing for accreditation. Among the issues dealt 
with will be the meaning of accreditation and the body of knowledge  
of the measurement process required for successful auditing. 
 
Panelists include  
Jim Cigler, Chief of the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation
Program 
Pete Unger from A2LA 
Bud Stott, Fluke Corp 
Lynne Neuman, Entela Inc 
Tom Wiandt, Hart Scientific, and  
Peter Crisp, Wavetek.  
This panel session will provide guidance by your peers 
on the preparations and considerations necessary to become and stay
accredited. 
 
3:30 p.m. Introduction to Statistical Thinking 
Statistical Thinking is a philosophy of learning and action 
based on recognition that (1) all work is a system of  
interconnected processes; (2) variation exists in all processes; 
and (3) understanding and reducing variation will lead to success 
Lynne Hare, Chief of the NIST Statistical Engineering Division 
will introduce the participants to the philosophy and 
application of statistical thinking in the three major levels of 
an organization: strategic, managerial and operational.  
By using an experiential learning exercise emphasizing a 
diversity of learning styles, he will show how to implement 
Statistical Thinking in an organization. Also provided will be a 
demonstration illustrating the advantages of reducing of variation. 
- ---------------------- 
Thursday, April 25 
 
8:30 a.m.  What's New?  
This is a new kind of 
session, one in which participants explain their tools and techniques 
for improved measurement quality. New training and educational 
information will be highlighted. There will be opportunities 
for announcements and  new industry area briefings. 
 
10:30 a.m.  Traceability: SI Units to Accuracy Ratios  
This session will cover the concept of traceability in all 
of its aspects: from the establishment and maintenance of national 
measurement standards to assuring proper performance of  
instrumentation on the production floor. Companies using, manufacturing, 
providing, importing, or exporting measurement-sensitive 
goods take the measurement infrastructure for granted until they perceive 
themselves as a part of it.   
 
This session will provide insight as to where a company or its 
laboratory fits into this infrastructure and what questions must be 
answered to maintain confidence in the measurements being made.  
 
Norm Belecki, Group Leader for NIST Electrical Calibrations will 
describe how NIST realizes the SI Units and translates these standards 
into calibration services.  
Bill Sorrells from Hewlett-Packard will describe how HP sets their  
equipment specifications. 
 
1:30 p.m.  Measurement as a Process 
Technical aspects of the measurement process will be 
covered in this session.  Some of the specific 
topics are:  
* Proficiency Testing Using Reference Materials 
by Roger Johnson, Eastman Kodak 
* Using Interlaboratory Comparisons for Process 
Improvement by Georgia Harris, NIST Office of Weights and Measures  
* Test Accuracy Ratios, Tolerance Testing, and the 
Concerns of the Shop Floor 
 
3:30 p.m. Standards for Measurements 
Traceability and uncertainty of the result of a measurement are 
critical whether the stated reference is to national or international 
artifact standards such as the International Prototype Kilogram or  
whether the reference is to an industry-wide measurement,  
such as moisture content of industrial scrap aluminum. 
 
This session will provide participants with a perspective on  
the evolution of a measurement process to a national or international 
standard from former Chairman of ASTM, Nancy Trahey, NIST 
Standard Reference Materials Program. In addition, you will have 
a unique opportunity to have your questions answered by members of a 
panel of experts on training, physical measurements, and sources 
for consensus standards. 
 
Philip Stein  O- 
Consultants in the Physical Sciences, Measurements, and Quality 
Chair-elect, ASQC Measurement Quality Division 
 

------------------------------

End of ISO 9000-3 Digest V1 #12
*******************************